REGIONALISM AND REGIONAL PARTIES


 
One of the notable features of the Indian Party System is the presence of a large
number of regional parties. By regional party we mean a party which generally operates
within a limited geographical area and its activities are confined only to a single or handful
of states. Further as compared to the broad ranging diverse interests of national parties,
the regional parties represent the interest of a particular area. In simple words, regional
parties differ from  All India parties both in terms of their outlook as well as the interests
they pursue. Their activities are focused on specific issues concerning the region and they
operate within the limited area. They merely seek to capture power at the state or regional
level and do not aspire to control the national government. It is noteworthy that in India,
the number of regional parties is much larger than the national parties and some of the
States are being ruled by the regional parties, viz.,  Andhra Pradesh,  T amil Nadu, Karnataka,
Assam, Jammu & Kashmir etc.
 
20.1 What is Regionalism
 
The term ‘regionalism’ has two connotations. In the negative sense, it implies excessive
attachment to one’ s region is preference to the country or the state. In the positive sense
it is a political attribute associated with people’ s love for their region, culture, language,
etc. with a view to maintain their independent identity .  While positive regionalism is a
welcome thing in so far maintaining as it encourages the people to develop a sense of
brotherhood and commonness on the basis of common language, religion or historical
background. The negative sense regionalism is a great threat to the unity and integrity of
the country . In the Indian context generally the term regionalism has been used in the
negative sense.
 
The feeling of regionalism may arise either due to the continuous neglect of a particular
area or region by the ruling authorities or it may spring up as a result of increasing political
awareness of backward people that have been discriminated against. Quite often some
political leaders encourage the feeling of regionalism to maintain their hold over a particular
area or group of people.
 
20.2 Different Forms of Regionalism
 
Regionalism in India has assumed various forms like:
(a)  Demand for State  Autonomy: Regionalism has often led to the demand by states for
greater autonomy from the center . Increasing interference by the Centre in the affairs of
the states has led to regional feelings. Demand for autonomy has also been raised by
regions within some states of the Indian federation.
(b) Secession from the Union:  This is a dangerous form of regionalism. It emerges
when states demand separation from the Centre and try to establish an independent identity
of their own.
Disputes between states over the sharing of river water, primacy given by the states to the
language of majority and to people of their own states in job opportunities have also given
rise to feelings of regionalism. Migration of people from backward state to a developed
state for employment opportunities have often resulted in a hostile attitude against the
migrants for example, problems going on in Karnataka and A.P .
 
20.3 Development of Regionalism in India
 
Regionalism is not a new phenomenon in the Indian political system. In the pre-independence
days it was promoted by the British imperialists and they deliberately encouraged the
people of various regions to think in terms of their region rather than the nation as a whole,
with a view to maintain their hold over India during the national movement.  After
Independence the leaders tried to foster a feeling among the people that they belonged to
one single nation. The framers of the constitution sought to achieve this by introducing
single citizenship for all.  With the same objective a unified judiciary , all Indian services, and
a strong Central government was provided. But in view of the vastness of the country and
cultures regionalism soon made its appearance in India.
 
The first manifestation of regionalism was the demand for reorganisation of states on
linguistic basis, but the most effective play of regionalism was the victory of the DMK
against Congress in  T amil Nadu in 1960s. Initially the central leadership felt that regionalism
was a peripheral political factor confined to  T amil Nadu and hence did not pose any threat
to national unity . However, that assessment was ill-founded. Soon in Punjab the Akali
movement gained momentum, while in Jammu and Kashmir Sheikh  Abdullah revived the
National Conference. During these initial years all the Indian political parties continued to
adjust with these regional forces on the plea that they would ultimately succeed in making
inroads into the bases of the regional parties and absorb them in their organisations.
The Indian National Congress which enjoyed monopoly of power between 1947–1967
and followed a policy of blowing hot and cold toward the regional forces, also contributed
to the growth of regionalism in India. It accommodated the regional forces when it was
convenient and raised a hue and cry against them when it was pitted against them. The
local Congress leaders also encouraged the growth of regionalism and strengthened their
hold on local party organisation, with a view to increase their bargaining power with the
central leaders. In fact a close link developed between central and regional leadership.
This close link between the central and regional leadership greatly encouraged the growth
of regionalism.
 
20.4 Causes for Growth of Regionalism
 
In India a number of factors have constituted to the growth of regionalism.
1. Regionalism made its appearance as a reaction against the efforts of the national
government to impose a particular ideology , language or cultural pattern on all people
and groups. Thus the States of South have resisted imposition of Hindi as official
language because they feared this would lead to dominance of the North. Similarly ,
in  Assam anti-foreigner movement was launched by the Assamese to preserve their
own culture.
 
2. Continuous neglect of an area or region by the ruling parties and concentration of
administrative and political power has given rise to demand for decentralization of
authority and bifurcate of unilingual states. On occasions sons of soil theory has
been put forth to promote the interests of neglected groups or areas of the state.
 
3. The desire of the various units of the Indian federal system to maintain their sub
cultural regions and greater degree of self-government has promoted regionalism
and given rise to demand for greater autonomy .
 
4. The desire of regional elites to capture power has also led to rise of regionalism. It is
well known that political parties like DMK, AIADMK, Akali Dal, T elugu Desam
Asom Gana Parishad etc., have encouraged regionalism to capture power.
 
5. The interaction between the forces of modernisation and mass participation have
also largely contributed to the growth of regionalism in India.  As the country is still
away from realising the goal of a nation state, the various groups have failed to
identify their group interests with national interests, hence the feeling of regionalism
has persisted.
 
6. The growing awareness among the people of backward areas that they are being
discriminated against has also promoted feeling of regionalism. The local political
leaders have fully exploited this factor and tried to feed the people with the idea that
the Central Government was deliberately trying to maintain regional imbalances by
neglecting social and economic development of certain areas.
 
20.5 Role of The Regional Parties
 
Though the regional parties operate within  very limited area and pursue only limited objective,
they have played significant role both in the State as well as national politics. The regional
political parties formed governments in several states and tried to give concrete shape to
their policies and programmes. Some of the important regional parties which formed
governments in various states include DMK and  AIADMK in  T amil Nadu; National
Conference in Jammu and Kashmir,  T elugu Desam in  Andhra Pradesh,  Asom Gana Parishad
in Assam; Maharasthrawadi Gomantak Party in Goa; Mizo National Front in Mizoram;
Sikkim Sangram Parishad in Sikkam; All Party Hill Leaders Conference in Meghalaya
and Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) in Haryana. Some of the regional parties were also
partners in the coalition governments formed in several States after the fourth general
elections of 1967. At the Centre also, of late the Regional Parties have been able to play
critical role in helping formation of Congress government. DMK, a regional party , supported
Mrs. Indira Gandhi’s government after split in the party in 1969 and enabled her to carry
on government despite loss of majority in the Parliament.  Telugu Desam was the pillar of
strength for the United Front and later the National Democratic  Alliance.  The
representatives of the regional parties focus the attention of the Parliament on issues in
their region and try to influence the policies of the Government to promote their own
interests.
 
But probably the greatest service rendered by the regional political parties is that they
have focused the attention of the people in remote areas on various political and economic
issues and contributed to their political awakening. Above all, the regional parties have
been able to impress on the national political parties that they cannot put up with their
attitude of indifference towards regional problems and have compelled them to take keen
interest in the resolution of their problems.
 
In short it can be said that the regional political parties have not only profoundly influenced
the regional politics but also left tremendous impact on the national politics.
 
20.6 Measures for Correcting Regional Imbalances
 
Regionalism has been an important aspect of Indian politics. Sometimes, it has posed
threat to the unity of the country . Hence it is necessary to take steps to reduce such
tendencies. Some such measures can be
 
(a) T o promote even development of the hitherto neglected areas so that they feel a part
of the national mainstream.
 
(b) The central government must not interfere in the affairs of the State unless it is
unavoidable for national interest.
 
(c) Problems of people must be solved in a peaceful and constitutional manner . Politicians
must not be allowed to misuse the issue of regional demands.
 
(d) Except for issues of national importance, the states should be given freedom to run
their own affairs.
 
(e) Changes are necessary in the Central-State relations in favour of the states, and for
introducing a system of national education that would help people to overcome regional
feelings and develop an attachment towards the nation.
 
What You Have Learnt
Regionalism means strong attachment to a particular region or a state as against the
country as a whole. This feeling arises either due to the continuous neglect of a particular
area or because the people of a particular region become politically aware and seek to
fight perceived discrimination. Regionalism is a problem because it threatens the unity and
integrity of the country .
 
The two prominent manifestations of regionalism are:
(a) agitation for separate statehood. Examples, demand for  Telengana, Bodo-land
(Assam), Gorkha land etc., and
(b) Secession from the Indian Union, for example – demand for Khalistan, demand for
Nagaland, etc.
About these ads

About k.vero

Philosopher King
This entry was posted in GENERAL STUDIES-II, INDIAN POLITY and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s